Jasper vs QuillBot: Which AI Writing Tool Is Better in 2026?

Jasper

From $39

QuillBot

From $8.33

Quick verdict

Overall pick: Jasper

Pick Jasper if you are a marketing team that needs copy templates, brand voice memory, SEO optimisation and a public API, and you can absorb a $39 per-seat price. Pick QuillBot if you are a student or individual focused on paraphrasing and summarising, want a free plan and a flat starting price of $8.33, and can live without templates, brand voice, SEO mode or an API. Jasper is the broader platform; QuillBot is the cheaper, narrower tool.

QuillBot's entry plan ($8.33) is 79% cheaper than Jasper's ($39).
Jasper charges per user while QuillBot uses a flat price, so QuillBot gets relatively cheaper as your team grows.
QuillBot has a free plan; Jasper does not.
Only Jasper offers: copy templates, brand voice / style memory, seo optimisation, public api.

Try Jasper →Try QuillBot →

Cost calculator

Team size: 5 users

Tool	Monthly	Yearly
Jasper · per user	$195.00	$2340
QuillBot · flat	$8.33	$100

Based on entry-level paid plans. Prices change, so check the vendor before you buy.

Which one should you choose?

If you need…	Pick	Why
Marketing team producing brand-consistent copy at scale	Jasper	Jasper has brand voice, copy templates, SEO mode and team workspaces, all of which QuillBot lacks except team seats.
Student paraphrasing and summarising on a budget	QuillBot	QuillBot offers a free plan and a flat starting price of $8.33, versus Jasper's $39 per seat with no free plan.
Buyer who needs a public API for custom workflows	Jasper	Jasper lists a public API; QuillBot does not.
Buyer who needs SEO-optimised content generation	Jasper	Jasper has an SEO mode; QuillBot does not.
Individual who wants to try before paying	QuillBot	QuillBot has a free plan; Jasper does not.

Feature comparison: Jasper vs QuillBot

Feature	Jasper	QuillBot
Free plan	❌	✅
Starting price	$39 /user/mo	$8.33 /mo
Copy templates	✅	—
Brand voice / style memory	✅	—
Plagiarism checker	✅	✅
Browser extension	✅	✅
SEO optimisation	✅	—
Team workspaces	✅	✅
Multilingual output	✅	✅
Public API	✅	—

Highlighted rows are where the tools differ.

Pros and cons

Jasper

Covers all eight tracked features, including templates, brand voice, SEO mode and a public API.
Built for marketing teams with brand-consistent content and team workspaces.
Per-seat billing scales cost with the number of users rather than a flat fee.

No free plan, so evaluation requires a paid commitment.
Starting price of $39 per seat is higher than QuillBot's $8.33 flat starting price.
Per-seat billing makes larger teams more expensive than a flat-priced tool.

Try Jasper →

QuillBot

Free plan available for evaluation before paying.
Flat starting price of $8.33 is lower than Jasper's $39 per seat.
Includes plagiarism checking, a browser extension, team workspaces and multilingual output.

No copy templates, brand voice memory or SEO optimisation.
No public API, limiting custom integrations.
Positioned for paraphrasing and summarising rather than full marketing content production.

Try QuillBot →