Grammarly vs QuillBot: Which AI Writing Tool Is Better in 2026?
Grammarly
From $12QuillBot
From $8.33Quick verdict
Overall pick: Tie
Pick Grammarly if you need brand voice and style memory plus team workspaces for everyday editing, and you are willing to pay per seat starting at $12. Pick QuillBot if paraphrasing and summarising are the priority, multilingual output matters, and a flat starting price of $8.33 suits you better. Neither tool offers copy templates, SEO optimisation or a public API, so buyers needing those capabilities will not find them in either option.
- QuillBot's entry plan ($8.33) is 31% cheaper than Grammarly's ($12).
- Grammarly charges per user while QuillBot uses a flat price, so QuillBot gets relatively cheaper as your team grows.
- Both offer a free plan, so you can test them side by side at no cost.
- Only Grammarly offers: brand voice / style memory.
- Only QuillBot offers: multilingual output.
Cost calculator
| Tool | Monthly | Yearly |
|---|---|---|
| Grammarly · per user | $60.00 | $720 |
| QuillBot · flat | $8.33 | $100 |
Based on entry-level paid plans. Prices change, so check the vendor before you buy.
Which one should you choose?
| If you need… | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-conscious buyer comparing entry prices | QuillBot | QuillBot starts at $8.33 on flat billing versus Grammarly's $12 per seat. |
| Team rolling out a shared writing standard | Grammarly | Grammarly offers brand voice / style memory and team workspaces; QuillBot has team workspaces but no brand voice feature. |
| Student paraphrasing and summarising sources | QuillBot | QuillBot is positioned for students and paraphrasing, and includes multilingual output. |
| Everyday grammar, tone and clarity editing | Grammarly | Grammarly is positioned for everyday writing and editing, with brand voice and a browser extension. |
| Buyer needing multilingual output | QuillBot | QuillBot lists multilingual output; Grammarly does not. |
Feature comparison: Grammarly vs QuillBot
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | ✅ | ✅ |
| Starting price | $12 /user/mo | $8.33 /mo |
| Copy templates | — | — |
| Brand voice / style memory | ✅ | — |
| Plagiarism checker | ✅ | ✅ |
| Browser extension | ✅ | ✅ |
| SEO optimisation | — | — |
| Team workspaces | ✅ | ✅ |
| Multilingual output | — | ✅ |
| Public API | — | — |
Highlighted rows are where the tools differ.
Pros and cons
Grammarly
- Brand voice / style memory for consistent tone
- Plagiarism checker and browser extension included
- Team workspaces supported
- Established since 2009 with a free plan
- Priced per seat starting at $12
- No multilingual output
- No copy templates, SEO optimisation or public API
QuillBot
- Lower starting price at $8.33 on flat billing
- Multilingual output supported
- Plagiarism checker and browser extension included
- Team workspaces supported
- No brand voice / style memory
- No copy templates, SEO optimisation or public API
- Founded in 2017, newer than Grammarly
At a glance
Writing assistant for grammar, tone and clarity.
Founded 2009 · From $12 · 4/8 tracked features
Best for: everyday writing, editing
See Grammarly alternatives →Paraphrasing and summarising toolkit.
Founded 2017 · From $8.33 · 4/8 tracked features
Best for: students, paraphrasing
See QuillBot alternatives →FAQ
Is Grammarly cheaper than QuillBot?
No. Grammarly starts at $12 per seat, while QuillBot starts at $8.33 on flat billing.
Do both tools have a free plan?
Yes, both Grammarly and QuillBot offer a free plan.
Which tool offers brand voice or style memory?
Grammarly offers brand voice / style memory; QuillBot does not.
Which tool supports multilingual output?
QuillBot lists multilingual output; Grammarly does not.
Do either of these tools offer SEO optimisation or a public API?
No. Neither Grammarly nor QuillBot lists SEO optimisation or a public API.
Related comparisons
- Copy.ai vs Grammarly
- Copy.ai vs QuillBot
- Grammarly vs Jasper
- Grammarly vs Rytr
- Grammarly vs Sudowrite
- Grammarly vs Wordtune
Data last reviewed: pending verification. All AI Writing tools →